We All Have KITT Now—And KITT Has a Sales Quota

How Economic Necessity Democratizeds the World's Most Advanced Technology

When I was eight years old, there was nothing I wanted more than KITT from Knight Rider. That calm, intelligent voice that could solve any problem, answer any question, and always knew exactly what to do. Every episode, I'd imagine what it would be like to have a companion that brilliant and loyal—one that could even drive itself to rescue you from a sticky situation.

But there was an unspoken assumption in that childhood fantasy. KITT belonged to Michael Knight, the show's hero. He was special, chosen, part of an elite organization with access to technology the rest of us could only dream about. The same was true for James Bond's gadgets from Q Branch—the exploding pens, the cars with ejector seats, the watches that could do impossible things. Advanced technology, we assumed, would always be exclusive. You had to be a secret agent, a billionaire, or part of some shadowy government program to get the really cool stuff. The rest of us would have to settle for whatever scraps of innovation eventually trickled down to regular people.

But something remarkable happened. We all have KITT now.

The smartphone in your pocket, connected to ChatGPT or Claude or Gemini, would have seemed like pure magic to that eight-year-old dreaming of his own AI companion. The most advanced AI models—systems that can solve graduate-level math problems, write sophisticated code, and engage in nuanced reasoning—are available for $20 a month, or in many cases, completely free.

This looks like the most democratic distribution of advanced technology in human history. But here's the twist that eight-year-old couldn't have imagined: we didn't get KITT because tech companies became altruistic. We got KITT because the economics of developing such advanced technology forced companies to give it to everyone.

The Economics That Forced Mass Distribution

The development costs for frontier AI companies are staggering in ways that make even the most expensive government programs look modest. Building these systems requires billions in upfront investment—OpenAI has raised $57.9 billion across multiple funding rounds, while Anthropic has secured $25.7 billion since 2021. The infrastructure, the compute power, hiring the world's brightest machine learning engineers—it all adds up to numbers that would make defense contractors blush. But here's the problem: even the world's most powerful institutions can't afford to pay the true cost of this technology.

Consider the Pentagon, with its massive $886 billion budget for the world's most sophisticated military. It allocates a sizeable $58.5 billion for IT and cyber activities—more than the entire GDP of many countries. Companies like Palantir have built successful businesses serving this market.

But here's where the math gets brutal. Even if you add China's $314 billion military budget and every other military on Earth, total global military spending reaches $2.7 trillion. That sounds enormous until you realize that just five tech companies—Google, Meta, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon—generate $1.4 trillion in revenue. That's more than half of all global military spending combined.

The implications are clear. Even if these tech companies captured every military IT dollar on the planet—perhaps $200 billion globally—they'd still need to find another $1.2 trillion in revenue. There's only one place to find customers at that scale: everyone.

This isn't democratization as some noble goal—it's democratization as economic necessity. The companies building these systems had no choice but to make them accessible to everyone, because "everyone" is the only customer segment large enough to make trillion-dollar businesses work.

Why Advertising Becomes Inevitable at Scale

But here's the problem with selling to everyone: not everyone wants to pay. You can build the most advanced technology in human history, but if you need hundreds of millions of customers to make the economics work, you'll hit a wall. Most people simply won't pay $20 a month for AI, no matter how impressive it is.

Unless you give it away for free and have someone else pay for it.

The pattern is everywhere you look. Google generates $350 billion in annual revenue, with the vast majority from advertising. Meta pulls in $164 billion annually, with 99% coming from advertising. These aren't companies that chose advertising—they're companies that discovered advertising was the only way to monetize billions of users.

At the scale needed to build hundred-billion-dollar businesses, advertising isn't just an option—it's inevitable. This isn't about companies choosing advertising. It's about advertising choosing them. Hardware companies like Apple and Nvidia are notable exceptions, but they're selling physical products.

But what about companies that built their entire brand on being ad-free?

Consider Netflix's journey. For years, CEO Reed Hastings was adamantly opposed to advertising. In 2020, he declared that "Netflix has no intention of monetizing with ads, ever," even calling advertising "a form of exploitation." Netflix built its entire identity around being the premium, ad-free alternative to traditional television.

But by April 2022, after facing subscriber losses, Hastings conceded: "We're quite open to offering even lower prices with advertising." The economics had forced even the most ad-resistant company to capitulate.

And here's the kicker: streaming executives at Netflix, Disney+, Paramount, and others all report the same thing: "total revenue per user is higher on the ad-supported plan than it is on the ad-free plan." At massive scale, the advertising model doesn't just work—it generates more revenue per user than subscriptions.

Even Netflix, the company that built its entire brand on being ad-free, couldn't resist the economics.

So when AI reaches mass adoption, the same forces take over.

The Same Mechanics Are Coming for AI

The transformation is already underway. Google, which built its empire on advertising, was first to integrate ads into AI. In October 2024, Google began rolling out ads in AI Overviews—those AI-generated summaries that appear at the top of search results. Advertisers running existing search campaigns now automatically qualify to appear in AI Overviews, and 12.47% of keywords now trigger these ad-integrated AI responses.

OpenAI started differently. They launched with a premium subscription model—$20 a month for ChatGPT Plus. Clean, simple, no ads. But as their user base exploded to 700 million weekly users, the same economic pressures began to mount. The company that once positioned itself as the anti-Google is now following Google's playbook.

The signals are unmistakable. OpenAI hired Fidji Simo, the former CEO of Instacart who spent her career at Facebook building video and advertising products and helping the company make money on mobile ads. She led a 700-person team responsible for Facebook's $55 billion advertising business. You don't hire that expertise to sell more subscriptions.

ChatGPT now includes shopping features with product recommendations and buy buttons. OpenAI is projecting $1 billion in advertising revenue by 2026. The infrastructure is being built, the talent is in place, and the revenue projections are set.

The math that forced Netflix's hand is now forcing AI's hand. The same economic inevitability that transformed every other platform at scale is transforming AI. The companies aren't being forced into advertising because we won't pay—they're choosing it because it makes more money.

When KITT Becomes a Salesman

So here we are. We all got KITT, just like we dreamed. But our AI companion isn't just trying to help us anymore—it's also trying to sell us stuff.

Google routinely gets criticized for how it orders search results, but at least search pages have clear visual separation. You see the list, you spot the "[AD]" labels, you make your own judgment. AI conversations are far trickier. How do you label a response that subtly favors vendors who've paid their advertising bills? When your AI assistant recommends three software solutions but doesn't mention the fourth option—the one whose company hasn't renewed their advertising contract—how would you even know?

The pressure to influence these answers will be enormous, backed by sales teams managing billions in advertising revenue. This isn't an abstract concern about business models. This is about whether we can trust the advice when we ask our AI companion for help.

But here's the thing: unlike search, where Google achieved near-monopoly status, AI remains fiercely competitive. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and others are all fighting for market share. This competition will likely push the industry toward the same variety of monetization approaches we see across the web today. Free tiers with ads and premium placement for casual users. Paid subscriptions for users who want cleaner experiences. Enterprise packages for businesses. Just like Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Spotify, and countless other services.

We got exactly what we wished for as kids, but the economics that made it possible also guaranteed it would come with strings attached. KITT is real, KITT is everywhere, and yes, KITT is very interested in what you might want to buy.

We got Q. We just didn't expect Q to work for the advertising department.

Related: